| Milton Keynes Fashion website |
Let the Right One In – 2008
Sometimes horror can provide a descriptive role of societies ills. The Blair Witch Project exemplified the void young people felt in pre-911 America, the absence of faith in the face of complex evils – a take on reality (hand held movie) that closed the existentialist gap between the norm and the not. Good modern movies often close that gap and are made ‘believable’ with an approach that similarly de-mythologizes their subject matter; the look of the films become tighter, leaner. Let the Right One In is filmed like this in its repetitive use of locale, its pauses over snow-swept streets and quiet, matt rooms, and it teases us with the final possibility of being not just descriptive (of adolescent ills and horrors) but also remedial. That it’s not disturbs me, but there’s also that element to horror. Not that director Thomas Alfredson needs to worry about getting away with anything. Let The Right One In doesn’t just rise above horror conventions - bulbous latex or dreaded dissonant chords. Instead, framed like a social drama, vampire Eli (Lina Leandersson) urges 12-year old Oskar (Kare Hedebrant) to deal with his tormentors, but it’s something he doesn’t have in him, and there is no rites of passage for either child, stuck at 12: “You have to come down, hard.” Eli’s insistence defines her side of the argument, and we think we know what she means when Oskar fights back. Later we realize she means something different, but by then, like Oskar, we’ve also taken sides. | Cache – 2005
Michael Haneke’s Cache, the reviews tell us, doesn’t leave us with any easy answers – the film is variously described in this way. If a film builds to a conclusion that is compelling and true to it’s self and that wishes not to reveal answers at the end, then I’ll applaud the film. 12 Angry Men is the prime example – the film makes a moral point more forceful by the fact it doesn't tell you what actually happened. Twice in Cache, George Laurent (Daniel Auteuil) has a clear opportunity to ask a question that will provide him and the rest of us with an answer the central question of the movie. Someone has been filming his apartment and meetings, sending him the recordings on videotape with gruesome images that relate back to a traumatic childhood memory. Who is making the tapes? Laurent, even confronting his demons, is blinded by rage and fear, and there’s obviously a lot, despite the overwhelming pain that Cache expresses, which remains in those recesses. But that Laurent can’t simply ask the question is frustrating at a narrative level; it interferes with the logic and truthfulness of the film; surely a television presenter looking for answers that will dramatically effect the whole future course of his life, would ask the obvious one. A work of genius nonetheless, but muted by that problem. |